Howell councilman clears up stand on possible Route 33 development

In the Aug. 14 edition of the Tri-Town News a story ap-peared regarding my position on the Route 33 corridor. I am compelled to provide the balance of the story more thoroughly.

First, the story’s tone might lead one to believe I am insensitive to the environment. This could not be further from the truth. As a candidate (for Town-ship Council), I made open space and farm preservation a centerpiece of my campaign.

As a councilman, I continue to support these causes. At my insistence, we have secured an inventory of all of non-township owned land so we can determine what parcels can be purchased for recreation and preservation. I also firmly support the November 2003 Farmland Preservation-Open Space ballot initiative.

Second, the story is ambiguous on the issue of "developing" Route 33. To one unfamiliar with the topic, they might think the development I was referring to was residential. This is not the case.

What I am referring to is transforming portions of Route 33 into a robust business hub, ripe with non-retail commercial properties.

It is my position that this area must be revitalized so that we can build a business tax base that will take more of the tax burden off Howell’s working families.

Third, there is a substantial inconsistency between the state land designation and our local designation for parts of the area. Specifically, large portions of the area are considered "environmentally sensitive." Yet, the township has designated portions of the exact same areas as "Special Eco-nomic Development" zones.

It seems inconsistent that an area designated for "special economic development" would or should at the same time be environmentally sensitive. It is due to this inconsistency that I feel a re-examination of the issue is warranted and this is what I requested we explore.

Fourth, I discussed the inconsistency issue with both the township planner and the assistant planner for Monmouth County. Both have agreed that the inconsistency is worthy of re-evaluating.

Fortunately, at my recommendation the council has agreed to pursue creating a redevelopment program for portions of the area that will afford us the capability to implement the rehabilitation of parts of Route 33.

I remain focused in my resolve to see this project through. How-ever, I am also aware there are special interests that will attempt to oppose this plan. The only interests I represent are those of the Howell residents.

Therefore, I will not be deterred or intimidated by any special interest groups who may want to block our efforts to help Howell’s working families. Be assured any final plan will protect the environment and at the same time provide a framework for business growth.

In closing, I am unaware why the original story did not cover these important issues. I hope my comments here address this topic more thoroughly. I am always open to input and suggestions on this or any township issue, so please feel free to call me at home anytime on (732) 761-8745.

Joseph M. DiBella

Township Councilman

Howell